History I

Years before Paul Ehrlich's book, The Population Bomb, I had already heard the same arguments. There was one man, in particular, who provided me with some ammunition to counter what was again coming around, this time from Ehrlich and others. (Nothing new, eh, Malthus)?

Never forget that we are dealing with misanthropes. Don't believe me? Look into President Obama's science advisor, Holdren, and his relationship with the Ehrlichs.

Looking back, I have the impression that my source may have been disclosing research that he shouldn't have. Unlike me, he had his pedigrees and a fairly high position. I choose to be secretive about him. I would think he must have died by now due to age, if nothing else. Did he have family? I have no idea. Still, because of the evil surrounding this and the evil that is appearing more and more frequently, I choose prudence. You don't need his verification. What I am about to share speaks for itself. Indeed, it should scream at you. Later, I will tell you how you can perform your verification. (Anyway, I doubt if any of what I was told was ever publicly published. I have never seen anything like it anywhere. Sound too conspiratorial to you? Perhaps. Just know that this was about the time certain LSD experiments were being performed on some human beings without their consent or knowledge).

My mystery man informed us that overcrowding, per se, is not that big of a problem. He cited the example of Hong Kong. (Interestingly, I just saw a report, all these years later, that tried to portray crowded conditions in Hong Kong as a problem. It showed small rooms being divided up into 'closet-sized' living spaces). Despite the fact that crowding was worse then than what was supposed to be disastrous (and even worse now), nothing of the dire sort predicted has happened. Curiously, however, we have approached some of the worst predictions in less crowded situations.

We were told about experiments conducted on mice (maybe it was rats - - - that part was not important to me). Draw your own conclusions whether it applies to humans. Life for the animals remained normal even with extreme overcrowding until the carbon dioxide, CO2, level was allowed to rise. Then, bad things started to happen. The animals began to chew on themselves. They would actually mutilate themselves. There were miscarriages. As the CO2 level rose higher, they turned on each other and killed the young. More homosexuality was observed. I don't believe I was told at what levels these things happened, so I must leave it there.

What about self-mutilation in our society? What do you call tatoos? Body-piercing? What would happen if we didn't have someone else to do it for us? Observe any of the other things transpiring? How about areas that aren't really over-crowded, but are places where there is a high local CO2 level? What about road rage? What about post offices? What about those kids in air-tight schools? What about passengers on airliners where the amount of fresh air has been decreased?

You can experiment on yourself. Here's your verification --- go stand in a closet. You can sit, but close the door in either case. CO2 is 'claustrophobia' gas. We are not trees. It is a waste product of our bodies, and we don't like to be immersed in high levels of it. Neither do mice (or rats). How long can you remain inside the closet? What thoughts do you have?

What do you suppose my thoughts were a few years after learning these things when I found out all of our emissions were required to be higher in carbon dioxide, CO2? Then, later I learned we were supposed to make our buildings and other things more air-tight. What do you suppose I predicted? What would you guess would happen? Can you answer why? Can you tell who is behind it? What else would you look for? Did you learn from history?